![]() They must split their Magic between spells and adept powers. Mystic adepts are a blend of inward and outward magic. I appreciate that some changes are tricky to integrate into a book without affecting layout- however, until I see a supporting document with additional errata that could not fit, I'm going to assume CGL only approved this many changes.Īdepts have a pool of points equal to their Magic that they use to purchase adept powers. The fact of the matter is, only about 60-70 changes were implemented in the January update. To be clear: I don't think the English errata team did half as much work as the German errata team or anything like that. I figured that at least the tables/stat changes would be easy to port over, without needing a translator. However, the overlap was surprisingly small. There is some overlap between the GCRB errata and the new errata, hence why the totals in the left column add up to higher than the right column. Removed: 6/266 (Was part of my initial list, but was fixed by hotfix or was never an issue/I interpreted it more as a "bad rule" than an "unclear rule") Nothing that affects rules/gameplay, just stuff that bothered me) These are the running totals I have ( Tracker See Bamce's sticky for more info on the errata compilation project):įan Fixed: 18/266 (Typo fixes I made and put in the errata compilation PDF. PM me if you have more to add, I've plagiarized a bunch from /u/Orffen already (He has a PDF Diff program).ĮDIT3? 4?: So, all that time and they barely implemented half as much errata as the GCRB translation team did. Presumably an easy fix.?ĮDIT: All changes are recorded here. Some of the sections aren't multiline (You only get 1 skill in 6e.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |